Search
Close this search box.

Smarter alarm management: from chaos to control

The right alarms at the right time, to the right people
Quality and uptime are paramount in semiconductor manufacturing, making alarm systems both a lifeline and a liability. When managed well, they safeguard quality and productivity. When mismanaged, they flood operators with noise and obscure critical issues, as well as contribute to costly downtime and scrap. This blog explores how a modern alarm management system can address this challenge.

The problem: alarm overload and its consequences

Semiconductor fabs are complex ecosystems. A single process deviation can trigger a cascade of alarms across multiple systems. Operators are often inundated with notifications—many of them false, redundant, or low-priority (see Figure 1). In fact, a study at STMicroelectronics revealed that more than 95% of alarms were low-priority, and only about 4% of alarms triggered any action [Al-kharaz et al., 2019]1. Worse, a small subset of alarms (just 100 out of more than 5,000) accounted for 70% of all alarm activity.

This “alarm noise” leads to:

  • Delayed responses to critical issues.
  • Operator desensitization, increasing the risk of missed alarms.
  • Reduced productivity and increased scrap rates.
Figure 1 Alarms come from many sources. The ability to quickly alert the right people on the floor with the most critical alarms and suppress the nuisance alarms is an advantage.
Figure 1: Alarms come from many sources. The ability to quickly alert the right people on the floor with the most critical alarms and suppress the nuisance alarms is an advantage.

The research: data-driven insights into alarm performance

Academic studies reinforce the need for smarter alarm systems. Key findings include:
  • Alarm floods—bursts of alarms in short timeframes—are often caused by chattering or repeating alarms and can obscure critical issues.
  • Nuisance alarms (e.g., stale or standing alarms) contribute significantly to operator overload and should be reclassified or removed.
  • Machine learning models can predict product scrap based on alarm patterns, achieving up to 75% accuracy (Al-kharaz et al., 2021)2. This opens the door to predictive quality control using alarm data.

The solution: SmartFactory Alarm Management

SmartFactory Alarm Management addresses these challenges head-on. It offers a centralized, automated, and integrated approach to alarm handling:

  • Automated filtering and prioritization: Only meaningful alarms are forwarded, with duplicates and false alarms suppressed.
  • Configurable notifications: Alerts are sent only to relevant staff, via email or SMS, with escalation paths if unacknowledged.
  • Action automation: Alarms can trigger predefined actions like putting a lot on hold or logging a tool down across MES, equipment automation, and other systems.
  • Comprehensive dashboarding: A real-time, factory-wide view of active alarms, plus historical analysis for root cause investigation.

The payoff: quality, efficiency, and peace of mind

By integrating alarm management into the broader SmartFactory ecosystem, manufacturers can:

  • Reduce downtime by accelerating root cause analysis.
  • Improve yield by catching quality-impacting issues earlier.
  • Empower operators with actionable, relevant alerts.
  • Streamline compliance with ISA and EEMUA standards.

Use case example

The SmartFactory Alarm Management 3.4.0 release included the integration of SmartFactory Knowledge Advisor (KA), which supports both containment actions (e.g., stopping a tool to prevent further issues) and corrective actions (e.g., steps to fix the underlying problem and return the tool to production). The integration of KA into the Alarm Management Solution (AMS) provides structured workflows for resolving alarms; Alarm Management identifies alarms from various tools and systems, and KA offers detailed action plans to address them. This improves efficiency of alarm management workflows, ensuring that alarms are not only identified, but also resolved promptly and effectively.

So how does it work? AMS identifies critical alarms, contains the event, and notifies users, but it does not provide steps for resolution. KA fills this gap by offering action plans that guide users through the resolution process, ensuring that alarms are addressed systematically. The application can support both automated and manual corrective actions. For example, an alarm can trigger an automated response to stop a tool, or it can generate a manual action plan for a user to follow. This streamlines the user experience by consolidating alarm management and resolution for E2E containment and correction and improves workflow efficiency.

Conclusion

Alarm management is not just about silencing the noise—it’s about amplifying the signal. With the right tools and data-driven strategies, semiconductor manufacturers can turn alarms from a source of frustration into a foundation for smarter, safer, and more efficient operations. If you’re ready to rethink how your fab handles alarms, reach out. You might be surprised at the benefits a smarter Alarm Management system can bring to your factory.

References

[1] Al-Kharaz et al., 2019 – Evaluation of Alarm System Performance and Management in Semiconductor Manufacturing. 6th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT’19).

[2] Al-Kharaz et al., 2021 – From Alarm System Events Towards Quality Inspection of The Final Product: Application to a Semiconductor Industry. 2021 European Control Conference (ECC)

About the Author

Picture of Yoram Barak, Global Product Manager
Yoram Barak, Global Product Manager
Prior to joining Applied Materials Automation Products Group in 2020, Yoram was a Global Marketing Manager at BASF Human Nutrition business division and before, an Innovation Manager for the Biosciences R&D Division at BASF. Yoram earned his PhD in Animal Sciences from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and specialized in Biotechnology throughout his career.